Tag Archives: peak oil

Earth Day: Do We Really Get It?

I took a couple of Earth Day-related polls for Swagbucks* recently. Here’s the first one:

I picked the last answer. I don’t do anything for Earth Day. I try to make overall lifestyle changes instead. Hopefully some of the other people who picked that answer are doing the same! Lifestyle changes, even smaller ones, have a bigger impact than anything you do for just one day.

Now, the second poll:

This one made me sigh (and not just because of the missing word). Reducing, re-using and recycling are great, but I don’t think they have the biggest impact. These activities do happen to be relatively easy, so more people are willing to do them. Plus, we’ve promoted the heck out of those three words in the media and in the school system. Any kid can tell you about the 3 Rs.

My choice was minimizing oil dependency, as that’s a crisis we’re already beginning to face, at $4-5 per gallon for gasoline.  An oil shortage and/or high prices will affect more of our lives than one might think. Besides gasoline for cars, oil is used to grow, manufacture, and transport products we buy, eat, and/or use every day. So if the price of oil goes up drastically, so does the price of everything else. If there’s not enough oil for cars, there’s also not enough for farm tractors or for plastics manufacturing.

I have to admit, though, that I don’t have any hard data on which practices really have the most impact (and didn’t find any via Google search). It’s just my opinion. What do you think?

 

 

*referral link

The End of Suburbia, the Rise of Local Networks

We watched a documentary last night — THE END OF SUBURBIA: Oil Depletion and the Collapse of The American Dream.

It’s very interesting, and some of what they predicted (the movie came out in 2004) has already happened.

But here’s one takeaway for me. There’s another reason for buying local, besides just feeling good about supporting the local economy.

I addressed the ideal of buying local in my Sustainability and Socks post, in which I concluded that buying local was not worth it for me in that case. In other cases (like the farmers’ market) I’ve found it very worthwhile.

But the movie had one really good reason. When oil really becomes scarce, we simply won’t be shipping products across the country, let alone around the world. It just won’t be an option. And we will need local options.

So if we develop local economic networks now, they will already be in place when we need them. But if we let local businesses die out, we may be stuck when the time comes.

Food for thought.

Car-Free Challenge, Day 6: More Ways To Cut Oil Consumption

Yep, I totally just stayed in today. I signed up for SOHO Action Day with the SOHO Solutionist, Brandie Kajino, and worked on writing and sending query letters and writing an article. And my dear, dear husband took care of the children and the house, and they stopped at the store while they were out, which was his idea, so it’s not cheating!

Tomorrow is getting-the-kid-ready-for-camp day, so it may involve going out to buy a few things. We’ll see.

Meanwhile, here is a link to an informative article from GOOD on things you can do to cut your oil consumption (besides not driving).

There are 42 gallons in one barrel of oil. About 20 gallons of a barrel go to gasoline, and the rest goes into making approximately 6,000 other items we regularly use, consume, and toss.

Go find out more! And Happy Friday to you.

Oil and Coal: Who Pays the Price?

The average price per gallon of gasoline in the United States is now $2.901; that’s almost double what it was in 2003 (Wolfram|Alpha, 5/1/2010).

The average price per kilowatt hour for electricity in the United States in January 2010 was 10.54 cents. That’s up from 8.2 cents per kilowatt hour in 2003 (U.S. Energy Information Administration).

Of course, this is nothing compared to Europe, where gas is often sold for $7-8 per gallon (due to heavy taxes), and Ireland, where electricity was going for about 22 cents per kilowatt hour in 2008 (also including taxes).

But what’s the REAL cost of this energy use? I’ve read that if you account for associated environmental and health costs, gasoline costs us about $12 per gallon. That’s from a 1998 report by the International Center for Technology Assessment, so I’m not sure how that translates to 2010, but it gives you an idea. It’s similar to the method the CDC used to calculate the associated costs of cigarette smoking.

I don’t think that takes all of the human costs into account, either.  How about:

We’re paying in human lives in order to have gasoline, heat, electricity, plastics, cheap food and more.

And no, I haven’t stopped driving altogether, gone off the grid, and started producing all of our own food. So I’m complicit too.

Peak Oil: Fear, Floundering, Solutions

I’ve known about the concept of peak oil for several years now. I’ve known that it’s likely we’ve already passed the peak of oil discovery and production for this planet.  It’s one of the reasons I began exploring sustainability and making lifestyle changes.

Peak oil’s possible effects may be even scarier than those of global warming.  Well, it’s kind of a toss-up now, and the combination of the two can’t be good.  If oil is scarce, it affects everything — food production, transportation, plastics production (and just think about how many things are plastic now), medical care, energy for heating, cooling and lighting homes, etc.  If we have too much carbon in the atmosphere, it warms the planet, melts glaciers and ice caps, affects plant, animal and insect species, kills the oceans, etc.

So are we in for a collapse? That’s the title of a movie recently reviewed by Roger Ebert. Collapse (which I haven’t seen) is an interview documentary, featuring Michael Ruppert, a writer and former LAPD officer, who describes what peak oil is and what he thinks will happen to the world because of it.

Ruppert is admittedly a controversial figure (he’s also a 9-11 conspiracy theorist) with a checkered past. However, Ebert says

I can only tell you I have a pretty good built-in B.S. detector, and its needle never bounced off zero while I watched this film.

Ebert agrees that we’re facing a global oil crisis, and that it’s potentially terrifying. The review is well worth reading.

We can’t really know what will happen without a time machine or crystal ball. Some people think we can change our lifestyles and learn to manage (although most people still don’t see the need and/or aren’t interested). Others, like Ruppert, see a worst-case scenario: a huge population die-off because of peak oil, global warming, and/or some other cause.

And I don’t know what to think about the future. I know some of the things we should be doing, and we’re doing some of them (and how lame does that sound?). Should I be telling my children that things may be very different by the time they grow up? Should we be stockpiling food and learning to hunt? Or do we just continue on and hope for the best?

The Tyee, a Canadian online magazine, has outlined steps that Canada or other countries could take if they were really serious about peak oil and global warming in “Let’s Make It a Hypergreen World.”

Others are focusing at a more local level. The Transition Towns movement aims to help communities “respond to the challenges, and opportunities, of Peak Oil and Climate Change.”  Communities can develop and put into practice an Energy Descent Action Plan, so that they will be prepared to live in a world where oil is scarce.  Many in the Transition movement visualize a more gradual change, rather than catastrophic collapse.

Portland, Oregon, where I live, has a burgeoning Transition Town organization. I’ve only been to one informational meeting so far, and am still rather unclear on what’s happening and how I might be able to get involved, but I’m glad it’s there.  There are currently 265 official Transition Towns around the world, mostly in English-speaking countries.

That’s the sort of thing that brings me back to hope. There are people in the world who are willing to work for change, and for community.

Future Health Care

The current U.S. health care system isn’t working. The health care reform bill under consideration now might help, or it might be too little too late.

Many countries use a single-payer system, which sounds good. The government collects taxes. The government pays for health care. The people pay nothing (aside from the taxes) or minimal co-pays for health care.  Everyone is taken care of.

However, there’s strong resistance to single-payer health care in the U.S., and I would now question whether it’s financially feasible on a national level.

I think that at some point in the future, health care decisions won’t be made on a national level.  I think what will work is a community-based system.

There are some existing hints of what this might look like.

The Transition Towns movement includes health care as one of the topics communities need to address in the post-peak oil era. A look at plans developed by Totnes and Kinsale in the UK shows that they’ve thought a great deal about what health care will look like and what kind of health care will be needed, but less about how this will be paid for or otherwise made available to the community.

Christian Healthcare Ministries, which I’ve heard about from Jesus-following radical Shane Claiborne, is a medical cost-sharing nonprofit organization.  Members pay a monthly amount into the program, and after a 45-day waiting period, are eligible to submit medical bills to the organization for assistance with payments. Pre-existing conditions are excluded, however (which is one of the problems with our current health insurance system). Members have a “personal responsiblility” amount they must meet each year, similar to a deductible in a traditional health insurance plan. There’s also a $125,000 lifetime limit for cost-sharing.  Could this work on a local level? You might need a certain number of people involved to make it work.

The Mondragon Cooperative Corporation in Spain, in addition to operating its cooperative businesses and schools, provides health care for its members, independently of the state.  So, people pay to be members of the cooperative, and as part of their membership benefit, they get health care.  Sounds pretty good! Again, you might need a critical mass of people involved in order to make it work.

The Co-Op Village Foundation has created a model (they hope to build an actual village soon) for cooperative villages which would include medical care for all members.  You can download their free book, which details the entire plan, but here are the basics:

-A group catastrophic health policy would be purchased to cover those who do not have entitlement health coverage.
– The Village might contract with a local medical group for primary health care for self-insurance, with X percent of the fees paid for by the Village and the balance paid by the resident. Over a period of time, the full amount might be paid by the Village.
– A pre-existing medical condition clause may be required to protect the Village from being overburdened by current catastrophic conditions. This clause probably would be required by the insurance provider but might apply to the Village self- insurance as well.

The village would also maintain access to preventative care for members, preferably on-site.  But it sounds like their plan is mainly to pay health care costs for members, rather than maintain their own health-care facilities.

That might work for a while.  I think that at some point communities will probably need to be more self-sufficient and less reliant on outside sources for medical care.  I think we’ll probably need something closer to the cooperative system, in which everyone in the community would chip in (at a level appropriate to their income) to hire medical practitioners for that community.  But that might mean that some communities couldn’t offer much more than food and housing to medical practitioners, which could result in great inequities if the doctors prefer to go where they’ll be paid more.

None of these solutions is perfect, and our future is very much in motion. It will be interesting to see what unfolds.